On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:42:27AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> writes: > > IFUNC doesn't solve the problem because either it gets resolved > > lazily (violating the above principle (*)), or we have to force _all_ > > symbols to resolve at startup, with may have a significant impact on > > startup time for large programs. > > IFUNCs are never resolved lazily; that's one way in which they differ > from PLTs. > > (BTW, in response to a comment upthread, ARM does support IFUNCs now.)
Hmmm, OK then -- the point about IFUNC not being suitable for this case is perhaps less valid, in that case. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
