https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90119
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84774
Bug 84774 depends on bug 84919, which changed state.
Bug 84919 Summary: [8/9 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to
restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67960
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
|--- |FIXED
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #23)
> Fixed trunk and gcc-9
And 8 now too:
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #24)
> The releases/gcc-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[meta-bug] Issues that |[meta-bug] Issues in gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> updating title to include PVS studio bugs
actually it looks like there was already a previous meta-bug for PVS-Studio,
bug 77421, but it's closed already... do w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=68230
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
is there an opportunity to extend -Wunused-parameter here, too? I don't get
anything from it currently... (see als
://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 |
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
moving the cppcheck meta-bug from the "See Also" field to the "Blocks" field
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94657
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94657
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4210
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91520
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #19)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> > @David: Can we close this now?
>
> I'm guessing he's probably waiting for his static anal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88745
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #12)
> Fixed.
Thanks, I backported the changeset to the (old) copy of libbacktrace I keep in
my fork of gdb and it only took a few tweaks to get it to compile. Now
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
You don't even need the analyzer for this; -Wwrite-strings already catches it:
$ /usr/local/bin/gcc -c -Wall -Wextra -Wwrite-strings 95007.c
95007.c: In function 'test':
95007.c:3:12: warning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94086
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66364
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks||85316
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
Blocks||54367
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6)
>
> We (at
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Document -Wchar-subscripts |Improve -Wchar-subscripts
||documentation
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||in-gcc at baka dot org
--- Comment #22 f
|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
dup of bug 39170
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39170 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=37874
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
While touching the code affecting attributes on function arguments, it might
also be worth taking a look at bug 37874
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #19 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> @egallager: Why did you add 'deferred' keyword? I sent a patch for it to GCC
> patches mailing list.
because:
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95294
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
|--- |WONTFIX
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #9)
> > Yes, but AFAIK none of the PRs specific to powerp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65213
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #4)
> > Why is it missing the static keyword then? (Or alternatively, why isn't it
> > in an anonymous namespace?)
>
> Huh? Without the warning developers may sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95588
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96214
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96468
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96460
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96570
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
Hm, I thought by enabling more warning options I could get a warning from one
of the other ones, but, I
||87403
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-30
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
Bug 59994 depends on bug 67135, which changed state.
Bug 67135 Summary: [thread_local] heap-use-after-free (OS X 10.10.4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67135
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67135
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66360
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #28 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92137
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87628
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #40 from Eric Gallager ---
Josef Wolf mentioned that he ran into this on the gcc-help mailing list here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2019-10/msg00079.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #42 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #41)
> > Josef Wolf mentioned that he ran into this on the gcc-help mailing list
> > here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2019-10/msg00079.html
>
> I don't think that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> > If this is becoming the meta-bug for all warnings that affect codegen, then
> > I'd like to add bug 61579 (-W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikestump at comcast dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7654
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 78736, which changed state.
Bug 78736 Summary: enum warnings in GCC (request for -Wenum-conversion to be
added)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52763
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60591
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> There are several other bugs open like this one, such as bug 78736
This is fixed now. It's probably still worth checking some of the other bugs
under its "See Al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91593
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #7)
> Author: jvdelisle
> Date: Wed Oct 2 02:35:14 2019
> New Revision: 276439
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276439&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 2019-10-01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86575
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #7)
> As I stated, it's only fixed in trunk, so it's still a regression in 7 and 8,
> as marked in the summary.
But you also said you weren't planning on backporting th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90159
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71045
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #23)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22)
> > (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #21)
> > > Since -Wjump-misses-init triggers too often for commonly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 49574, which changed state.
Bug 49574 Summary: Give a warning for insane overloading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90205
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Tavian Barnes from comment #8)
> Maybe "argument 2 has type 'double' (promoted from 'float')"?
Yes, that seems better to me, at least...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to gcc-bugs from comment #6)
> I can confirm that this works from 9 and up. Is there any chance to backport
> it to 8?
That's why this bug is still open.
>
> In the ticket it says `Target Milesto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85678
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
This keeps getting brought up in bug 91766 (already added as related from the
other end)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #9)
> Trunk now emits:
>
> t.c: In function ‘foo’:
> t.c:4:8: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘}’ token
>bar()
> ^
> ;
> t.c:7:1:
> }
> ~
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58884
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23577
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fuchedzhy at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91998
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Gregory Fuchedzhy from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> > *** Bug 91998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> Not exactly a duplicate, but related.
> Cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45821
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||90556
Summary|no warning when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67455
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> > 67455.m:21:2: warning: (Messages without a matching method signature
> > 67455.m:21:2: warning: will be assumed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #3)
> The handling of target options (the patch for bug 45475) is another
> host-dependency in the bytecode stream.
That has been closed as fixed... which parts of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67299
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60523
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> *** Bug 70952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
While this was a mistake, it still might be worth grouping the flag proposed in
that bug, -Woctal-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83806
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
1 - 100 of 3691 matches
Mail list logo
