--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 13:02 ---
Closing this PR, as this is likely a linux kernel or sh bug, in any
case, not a GCC bug.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 12:32 ---
Well, there's nothing we can do without a stand alone (if possible simplified)
reproducer.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 14:37 ---
This is now handled properly (has been for a long time actually).
In Ada 95 mode, the code is rejected:
test_306835.adb:9:04: instantiation error at line 5
test_306835.adb:9:04: aliased component type must be
mpolines not working on x86-64 windows vista
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 12:20 ---
Are you using a 64 bit compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40837
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 13:10 ---
Interesting, thanks for the feedback. Let me double check a few things on
my side (testing various GCC versions).
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40837
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 15:02 ---
My confusion: I thought I had tested with GCC 4.5 but in fact I had used
GCC 4.3 which does not have the 'MINGW_ENABLE_EXECUTE_STACK' macro (and
__enable_execute_stack symbol).
Arno
--
charlet at g
--- Comment #15 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-26 20:33
---
Right, my change fixed gnatmake so that it would call the proper gcc (based on
the
previous comments on this PR), but Makefiles have never supported
--program-suffix, so that's not even a regression.
Feel
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 09:11 ---
I guess you did not follow the build instructions properly: if you build a
cross
Ada compiler, you need to first build a matching native compiler from the
*same*
sources.
Here you are using an older base compiler
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 08:25 ---
Subject: Bug 17566
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Aug 10 08:25:05 2009
New Revision: 150617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150617
Log:
2009-08-10 Vincent Celier
PR a
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 08:27 ---
Should now be fixed
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 13:06
---
Subject: Bug 18434
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Nov 14 13:05:58 2005
New Revision: 106886
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106886
Log:
2005-11-14 Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #22 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 13:51
---
Subject: Bug 18434
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Nov 15 13:51:09 2005
New Revision: 106950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106950
Log:
2005-11-14 Robert Dewar <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 13:59 ---
Subject: Bug 23732
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Nov 15 13:59:02 2005
New Revision: 106980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106980
Log:
PR ada/23732
* gnatvsn.ads (Library
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 14:04 ---
Subject: Bug 15604
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Nov 15 14:03:56 2005
New Revision: 107006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107006
Log:
2005-11-14 Ed Schonberg <[EMAI
--- Comment #23 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 14:08
---
Fixed.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 14:09 ---
Fixed.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 14:10 ---
Fixed.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 15:15 ---
Works fine on mainline as of today.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 15:17 ---
Closing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 15:23 ---
The minimum requirement is not out of date.
There has indeed always been a different requirement for cross compilers
where you need to first have a native compiler using the exact same
version, and that should
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 09:43 ---
I got a bugzilla internal error when trying to attach a proposed
patch, so here it is inline (be careful with tabs and spaces,
I'd suggest applying the patch manually):
<<
--- libada/Makefile.in.orig
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 09:02 ---
So closing as not a GCC bug (likely a GNU make bug).
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-27 17:26 ---
Please file a self contained test case, it is inappropriate to reference
third party CVS in particular if a specific date must be used.
Also please extract proper sources and remove the need to for any extra
step
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 07:11 ---
<>
No, the compiler is giving you a list of source files, so you should only
include those source files, and verify that the bug can indeed
be reproduced with these sources only (some additional source fil
--- Comment #13 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 11:27
---
This PR should now be fixed, AFAIK.
Fixed by:
<<
libada:
2005-12-05 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.in (FLAGS_TO_PASS): Add GCC_FOR_TARGET.
gcc/ada:
2005-12-05 Paolo Bonz
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 13:53 ---
The solution is to use s-auxdec-dummy.ad[sb] for your target in ada/Makefile.in
Since this target has not been ported at all to Ada (no section in Makefile.in
defining LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS), you will first need to
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 14:52 ---
Is this issue still present ?
If the issue is with the bootstrap compiler, there's not much we can do.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:33 ---
Closing, as per Laurent's message.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 13:28 ---
The bug is that the following line in s-osinte-linux-hppa.ads is wrong:
for atomic_lock_t'Alignment use 8 * 16;
The alignment clause takes *bytes*, not *bits*, so you need to use instead:
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 08:47 ---
gprmake was a beta tool never documented, which probably should not have been
put
in the first place, so instead I'll likely remove it at some point, since in
any
case, gprmake does not really belong in th
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 08:13 ---
Please post a self contained set of sources, and a self contained command line
to
reproduce the box, thanks.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 07:52 ---
<<
If you can't reproduce the warning remember that GNAT warnings depend on the
compiler version.
>>
You're right, and you should use a GNAT version older than the version
you are
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 07:54 ---
Same as previous bug, you need to use version of GNAT older than the sources
you build.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 10:16 ---
Any version from the FSF sources than the version you're trying
to build should do (e.g. GCC 3.4, 4.0, 4.1).
Anyway, you do not need to be a maintainer do submit and commit patches,
so if this issue is blockin
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 10:19 ---
If you want to act like a maintainer, then I'd suggest you submit patches,
and once you get approval, commit them, it's trivial after all, as you said.
The issue here is that you're trying to mix
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 15:03 ---
Looks like a mingw/environment issue to me.
Never seen such thing myself.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 17:50 ---
The command line you quoted is much less than 8192 characters (I count 3744
characters), so I guess your build environment is somehow creating additional
limitations, and/or some shell artefact or a bug in make is
--- Comment #27 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 16:05
---
BTW, this is not a bug, but a possible enhancement, and a very tricky one at
that, since removing too many checks will hurt much more Ada programmers than
having too many, so let's please be extra careful
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 08:40 ---
Subject: Bug 19037
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Aug 14 08:40:11 2007
New Revision: 127422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127422
Log:
2007-08-14 Olivier Hainque <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 09:20 ---
Closing as per latest changes.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 10:19 ---
Subject: Bug 4720
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Aug 31 10:19:18 2007
New Revision: 127967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127967
Log:
2007-08-30 Vincent Celier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 10:32 ---
This is now fixed.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 16:09 ---
cxa* tests have already been handled by Eric in latest sources.
controlled2.adb was a missing commit, also fixed yesterday.
So the solution is simply to update your tree.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 14:36 ---
This is indeed fixed already on trunk as suggested.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-13 21:39 ---
4.1 is pretty much closed at this point, so closing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 10:53 ---
GNAT GPL 2007 is not an FSF release.
Your code compiles fine with GCC 4.3.0
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:16 ---
Fixed in 4.2.1, so closing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:24 ---
This is fixed in mainline.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:31 ---
Test case now compiles fine.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:36 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:38 ---
Compiles fine on trunk.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 16:38 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
08:54 ---
Investigating...
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:03 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:05 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:05 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:06 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
Bug 19408 depends on bug 19900, which changed state.
Bug 19900 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] ACATS c391002 c432002 ICE
categorize_ctor_elements_1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:07 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:11 ---
Marking as fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:09 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:17 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15
16:32 ---
Adding nathanael in cc:
Nathanel, could you have a look at the comment #10 about passing
GCC_FOR_TARGET down to libada/Makefile ?
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:27 ---
I do not see any GNAT bug here. Potentially a problem in your code,
or in the Win32 API you used, but that's all.
Note that GNAT.Sockets.Thin as shown in your build output is an internal
unit that s
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:32 ---
AFAIK, this should be fixed by recent libada changes, since a stamp-libada
is now used that should address this issue. Could someone verify this ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:38 ---
Changing summary line.
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ada compiler not
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:46 ---
Is this test still failing ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19380
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:46 ---
Is this test still failing ?
If so, could you run the test under the debugger and give a backtrace ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19381
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:47 ---
Is this test still failing ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19382
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:48 ---
Are these tests still failing on mainline ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19383
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:49 ---
Is this test still failing on mainline ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19384
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
10:51 ---
Valgrind is confused by the use of trampolines, so this is not
a GCC bug.
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
11:12 ---
Confirmed, looks like a real error.
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17
16:05 ---
There is no bug here, the addresses can be different, so you should not
rely on this.
Refiling as a possible enhancement.
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18
12:39 ---
Fixed.
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
16:29 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
08:49 ---
Closing, fixed on mainline as far as I can see.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
08:56 ---
Confirmed, due to incorrect dependency in gnattools/Makefile.in
Fixing...
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
08:59 ---
Should be fixed now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
09:12 ---
Here is a further simplification of the test case:
procedure PQ is
subtype C_ULongis Interfaces.C.unsigned_long;
typeC_Chtype is new C_ULong;
type Character_Attribute_Set is array (0
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
09:32 ---
Is the bug still present on mainline ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18860
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:00 ---
I confirm the analysis in comment #2
Nathanael, could you please have a look and fix this regression ?
Also, having the TOOLS_TARGET_PAIRS being now set in configure.ac is
more painful to maintain than
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:02 ---
OK, so closing then.
Arno
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:04 ---
Is this still failing on mainline ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19380
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:06 ---
Suspending, pending user feedback.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:12 ---
As far as I can see, this is likely a glibc bug (in unwinding), now fixed, so
closing this PR as "invalid".
Arno
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:16 ---
Original issue fixed, as well as the issue of building xnmake on 64
bit platforms.
Closing this PR.
Please open a new one with additional info if the mainline has some
new issue, thanks.
Arno
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
10:27 ---
Right, gnatmake has never supported -mno-cygwin. Instead, I'd suggest
configuring gcc for mingw to start with.
According to
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/Option-Index.html#Option-Index
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31
10:28 ---
There is no bug here: named notation is not supported for this pragma.
Named notation is also not supported for any of the Ada defined pragmas,
so there is no reason to expect this to work.
We'll s
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 09:28 ---
This was broken by the following change AFAICT (rev 121082):
<<
2007-01-23 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR bootstrap/30541
* Makefile.def (flags_to_pass): Add GNATBIND
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 10:34 ---
Please submit a self contained bug report with all needed sources. Even better
would be a reduced test case, thanks.
Note that GPS sources have changed and no longer have the code you quote.
--
charlet at gcc
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 13:20 ---
Closing, we're not in the business of figuring out what's wrong with debian's
version of GCC :-)
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-07 09:39 ---
This is a bug in your base compiler, not in GCC 4.4.0.
See other past reports on this issue, where the bug was in the distributor
(Debian ?) compiler, and not in any official GCC releases.
Arno
--
charlet at
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:06 ---
I'm assuming the proper --disable switch is either already there, if not,
probably worth opening another PR. Keeping this PR as an enhancement request
to add support for x86_64 solaris for Ada.
--
charlet a
--- Comment #8 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 08:02 ---
Sounds like something specific to RTEMS, since I've never seen something like
that on any other platform.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 33688
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Mar 26 07:34:57 2008
New Revision: 133545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133545
Log:
2008-03-26 Thomas Quinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 07:58 ---
This PR should now be addressed, please reopen if not, clarifying what's
missing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-05 08:15 ---
closing
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
