https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |xry111 at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so the issue is that expand_simple_binop will not necessarily return a
register and emit_cmp_and_jump_insns eventually mangles things.
The proposed fix looks OK, but please add a comment like
/* For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109123
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 54668
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54668&action=edit
patch
The diagnostic pass (pass_warn_access) is already split into two modes,
unfortunately the -Wuse-after-f
;)
for (; ipmi_ek_compare_link_record2_0;) {
int link[COMPARE_CANDIDATE];
}
}
when compiled by today's gcc trunk, does this:
$ ~/gcc/results.20230315/bin/gcc -c -w -O1 -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
bug896.c
during RTL pass: expand
bug896.c: In function ‘ipmi_ek_compare_link’:
bug89
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109134
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Having that extra TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED really isn't sustainable. But the
main issue is that the instrumentation happens after (some) folding has taken
place.
We probably also have still code second-gue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109135
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:36:27PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
> apl.washington.edu wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109135
> >
> > --- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am almost positive it is r13-6661-gbd6e566e9dc543cf4f6df69dcefb40bb8b4100f1 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Honza, the reporter uses -march=znver1 - why did these backports affect
> anything but zen4?
(X86_TUNE_AVX256_MOVE_BY_PIECES): Add znver1-3.
(X86_TUNE_AVX256_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
I've pushed the more aggressive .DEFERRED_INIT removal so the issue might be
only latent now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the rest is discussed in PR109093...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109138
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
COARRAYS:
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
> I tried other testcases that use coarrays, but e.g. the following scalar
> coarray case produces an ICE later on. I believe this is a pre-existing
> separate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
>
> --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
[...]
> Version 2 of the patch catches some more cases found in the iso libraries.
I've tried that one last night and most of the failures are go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd like to understand what is the difference between those .DEFERRED_INITs on
unused vars and normal vars.
If I try
typedef int V __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
__attribute__((noipa)) void
foo ()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45641f3a99281bb0a429649741a29c2aace4c63e
commit r13-6690-g45641f3a99281bb0a429649741a29c2aace4c63e
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Wed Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fc541efc340535d212cd685176bd9592905de8a
commit r13-6691-g0fc541efc340535d212cd685176bd9592905de8a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
Bug ID: 109140
Summary: ICE when building qemu (qemu-user, MIPS component) on
sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu with -march=niagara4
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 54669
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54669&action=edit
target_mips_tcg_lmmi_helper.c.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 54670
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54670&action=edit
reduced.i
Attached reduced version.
```
# sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc reduced.i -O2 -mcpu=niagara4 -c
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I'll bisect later but someone is free to beat me if they want. I think 11 was
fine, but need to check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97d599e09b0fd389a7cbac8867e56977ec97900f
commit r12-9254-g97d599e09b0fd389a7cbac8867e56977ec97900f
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107396
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The diagnostic is correct I think - I wonder why I do not see it on
x86_64-linux. It probably depends on the glibc version (I have 2.31)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107451
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c722c6b061a5e909267eae53ffe5910fbe0a7d5e
commit r12-9255-gc722c6b061a5e909267eae53ffe5910fbe0a7d5e
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108500
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b955080a5ab8690902f7cc99a770f9c3da171d6f
commit r12-9256-gb955080a5ab8690902f7cc99a770f9c3da171d6f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108724
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21e7145aaf582c263e69a3ee05dfa9d42bdbd1aa
commit r12-9258-g21e7145aaf582c263e69a3ee05dfa9d42bdbd1aa
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108821
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbbbaed64f39aae57f5f167174121c1be9d18282
commit r12-9261-gdbbbaed64f39aae57f5f167174121c1be9d18282
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108950
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4e4108dd005084fc1c88bba14fda6b200e70daa
commit r12-9262-gf4e4108dd005084fc1c88bba14fda6b200e70daa
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108625
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e19e9c36abc7fff9c628cf744e55e4c0e686ea53
commit r12-9257-ge19e9c36abc7fff9c628cf744e55e4c0e686ea53
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108793
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a3642dde799ee2be9f2b60ec361191176390005
commit r12-9259-g0a3642dde799ee2be9f2b60ec361191176390005
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Known to fail|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108816
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02ff8c8ebcb7f9b0885946d17ff12523e7522b71
commit r12-9260-g02ff8c8ebcb7f9b0885946d17ff12523e7522b71
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Version|12.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108807
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109069
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108500
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.2.1
Summary|[11/12 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.2.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 106904, which changed state.
Bug 106904 Summary: [12 Regression] Incorrect -Wstringop-overflow with partial
memcpy() into a nested structure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109141
Bug ID: 109141
Summary: failure to diagnose -Wuse-after-free early
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Bug ID: 109142
Summary: auto tmp=*(data_type*)&v: expected
primary-expression before ')' token
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-15
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108898
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I did not know there was a way to do that! I'll add this to my to-do list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109138
--- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su ---
Oh, good catch, Jakub! And sorry for the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
Jeff Hammond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff.science at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107453
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109143
Bug ID: 109143
Summary: PTA compile-time hog with many calls
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
commit r13-6693-g3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
commit r13-6693-g3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
commit r13-6693-g3ea64aad06a2b32739028bae03b9b9a5691d2d30
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58538
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40c1352c5a4530350012d6a922435cf491663daa
commit r13-6694-g40c1352c5a4530350012d6a922435cf491663daa
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ccbf162511b896672a72934c3cafd37a42d6438
commit r13-6692-g5ccbf162511b896672a72934c3cafd37a42d6438
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 regression] ICE |[11/12 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #6 from stu t ---
Thank you for looking into this! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109130
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
I can't reproduce that. on a Neoverse-N1 I see between those two commits:
./bench-compare.sh 2fc55f51f99 bad177e8487
A 1457 files
D 0 files
M 0 files
Extracted 'loose/2fc55f51f99:2fc55f5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
--- Comment #2 from steve02081504 ---
Created attachment 54672
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54672&action=edit
cpp file
Here's the pre-processed file you want,hope it helps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68608
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68608, which changed state.
Bug 68608 Summary: [concepts] ICE with explicit class instantiation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68608
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109113
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
readreal.mod requires the input file testnumber to be in the same directory as
the executable invocation.
Or manually create a text file containing:
cat << EOF > testnumber
12.3456
EOF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109144
Bug ID: 109144
Summary: d: Closure fields don't get same alignment as local
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
> readreal.mod requires the input file testnumber to be in the same directory as
> the executable invocation.
>
> Or manually create a text file c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109113
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And C++ ICEs on this starting with r8-4783-gd68ddd2b35078ab61f164b268b
(again, accepts the g case).
C++ used to ICE on
struct C i = { .e = { { .b = 0, .c = { 1 } }, f } };
since that revision but since r8-53
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Bug ID: 109145
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c from
r13-6624-geb337d28c32b1b fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I wonder why we instantiate from unused_function (but don't diagnose) at all?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107396
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I currently have 2.36.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109135
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:35:41AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109135
>
> --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We don't instantiate in that case, just look up a specialization which might be
or might not be later instantiated (which is when it is diagnosed).
One way to fix this would be to drop locations from the exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105909
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Perhaps via 3.58 notification object:
https://docs.oasis-open.org/sarif/sarif/v2.1.0/os/sarif-v2.1.0-os.html#_Toc34317894
which: "describes a condition encountered during the execution of an analysis
tool wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109146
Bug ID: 109146
Summary: Tail call prevention in frame-address.c is not correct
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109146
--- Comment #1 from David Spickett ---
Correction. https://godbolt.org/z/fW5nsWE5e shows the issue when "!=" is used,
the previous link used "==" instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
With -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mcpu=niagara4 the ICE reproduces with gcc-10.4.0 but
not with gcc-9.5.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
template
using data_type = decltype([](){return 1;}());
template
auto get_precision(T v) {
auto tmp = *(data_type *)&v;
return tmp;
}
Clang and MSVC accept this with C++20, though I'm not sure if it's re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||107430
Keywords|
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
