https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |testsuite-fail
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2023-03-15
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Humm, argument passing oddity? Or probably "old" glibc complex.h header not
using __builtin_complex for CMPLXF (...)? It seems to pass for me with a
cross and using native x86-64 complex.h headers ...
My complex.h has
#if defined __USE_ISOC11 && __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 7)
/* Macros to expand into expression of specified complex type. */
# define CMPLX(x, y) __builtin_complex ((double) (x), (double) (y))
# define CMPLXF(x, y) __builtin_complex ((float) (x), (float) (y))
# define CMPLXL(x, y) __builtin_complex ((long double) (x), (long double) (y))
#endif
can you have a look or at least attach preprocessed source? Can you
check if changing the testcase to use __builtin_complex (..) fixes it?
