Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful

2005-04-23 Thread William Beebe
I've bootstrap built GCC 4.0.0 on Fedora Core 3. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: athlon-fedora-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt2/gcc4 --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --with-system-zlib--enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-ex

Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc?

2005-05-13 Thread William Beebe
If you want that kind of cross referencing, then you shouild look at Doxygen (http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/). It will produce excellent cross references for HTML, Latex, RTF, and XML. There are pre-built binaries for Linux distributions, Solaris, and Windows, and Doxygen is usually in most

Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc?

2005-05-15 Thread William Beebe
re? On 5/15/05, Paul Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William Beebe writes: > > > > >If you want that kind of cross referencing, then you shouild look at > Doxygen (http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/) > > > > I need the cross-reference output fro

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]

2005-05-28 Thread William Beebe
On 5/28/05, Scott Robert Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brainstorming there may be, but certain folk in the GCC community simply > like being annoying, perhaps to feed their own sense of self-importance. > It is quite possible to disagree with someone without be disagreeable, > as exemplified b

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]

2005-05-29 Thread William Beebe
On 29 May 2005 11:37:00 +0200, Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Robert Ladd) wrote on 28.05.05 in > > In my experience, people don't file Bugzilla reports because it feels > > impersonal and unresponsive. The form is not very user-friendly (as in > > friendly t

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla?

2005-05-30 Thread William Beebe
On 5/29/05, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Setting aside for the moment that GCC is a software package *targetted* at > developers, and hence the above is not necessarily a serious problem, I > agree that the Bugzilla interface isn't exactly my favorite UI. However, > I haven't figured

GCC 4.0.1 RC1 successful build

2005-06-09 Thread William Beebe
GCC 4.0.1 was successfully built on Fedora Core 3 using 3.4.4 as the starting compiler. [EMAIL PROTECTED] opt2]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt2/gcc401 --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib -enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit

Re: gcc 4.0.1 regressions with friend injection

2005-07-25 Thread William Beebe
Which leads me to the old saying that friends don't let friends use friends. On 26 Jul 2005 03:07:49 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | We are seeing tons of regressions (9 of 2377 for fink, over 100 or so > | out of 8000 was it for i