On 29 May 2014, at 23:06, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Having a "parent" set would be nice, yes. I maintain two repos for several
> FreeBSD-versions. Being able to pull some of the deps from packages instead
> of blindingly building would be nice.
Yes, for a lot of cases you only want to build a sma
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:46:05 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 29 May 2014 14:29, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:09:05 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 29 May 2014 13:18, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> >> anyway. Besides all of this - I'm thinking of just introducing:
> >> >>
> >
These patches switch hpt27xx(4) from timeout() to callout() and fix it to use
its existing locks in place of Giant for CAM along with some other cleanups.
If anyone has any hardware I suspect the ioctl handling is buggy, but I'm more
hesitant to touch that unless someone has multiple adapters i
On 30 May 2014 07:57, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Ugh. Ok. I was too deep in the trenches of device drivers and other
>> ancillary things doing bad things to char/short with cpu ids when
>> walking things. I totally missed kinfo_proc.
>>
>> I'll go think about it a bit more.
>
> It shouldn't be too ha
John Baldwin wrote:
> Yes, I actually started by sorting on the raw delta and ended up going back
> and fixing
> pctcpu instead. However, there is a problem in this case which is that you
> still want to fall back to ki_pctcpu if you don't have a valid previous delta
> to compare against. It's
On May 28, 2014, at 9:54, John Baldwin wrote:
> Yes, I actually started by sorting on the raw delta and ended up going back
> and fixing
> pctcpu instead. However, there is a problem in this case which is that you
> still want to fall back to ki_pctcpu if you don't have a valid previous delta
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:04:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
| On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:21:10 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
| > Hi!
| >
| > When system is writing a kernel core dump, it issues watchdog
| > pat wdog_kern_pat(WD_LASTVAL). If ipmi is in action, it registers
| > ipmi_wd_event()
TB --- 2014-05-30 14:40:36 - tinderbox 2.22 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-05-30 14:40:36 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:35:25PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On May 23, 2014 07:53 PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:58:52AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > > [NOTE: crossposting between freebsd-current@, freebsd-security@, and
> > > freebsd-stab
On 5/30/14, 10:44 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:04:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
| On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:21:10 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
| > Hi!
| >
| > When system is writing a kernel core dump, it issues watchdog
| > pat wdog_kern_pat(WD_LASTVAL). If ipmi i
Any clue on this ? :(
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Fred Pedrisa
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 02:19
Para: 'Adrian Chadd'
Cc: 'freebsd-current'
Assunto: RES: Thread Scheduler Priority
Hello,
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 02:12 -0300, Fred Pedrisa wrote:
> Hi, Guys.
>
>
>
> How can I adjust a certain thread to have the maximum system priority in the
> scheduler ?
>
>
>
> I've tried doing it this way :
>
>
>
>/* Set thread priority. */
Hello,
This is 'min' and 'max' for the default policy :
Min : 0, Max : 103
In my system.
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Ian Lepore
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 30 de maio de 2014 23:50
Para: Fred Pedrisa
Cc: 'f
13 matches
Mail list logo
