On May 28, 2014, at 9:54, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Yes, I actually started by sorting on the raw delta and ended up going back > and fixing > pctcpu instead. However, there is a problem in this case which is that you > still want to fall back to ki_pctcpu if you don't have a valid previous delta > to compare against. It's a lot simpler to just fixup ki_pctcpu and not have > to go > change the sorting code explicitly. :( I actually started out having a > function that > returned a double for the pctcpu, but that would mean recalculating the raw > pctcpu > many, many times during the sort. Just updating ki_pctcpu once per each > process/thread > per fetch scales a bit better. I could perhaps use an array to cache raw > percentages > as doubles. > > Ok, try people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/top_pctcpu2.patch >
Hey, all the 0.00% processes on my server now show up in top with measurable usage. Nice. (They're all between 0.3% and 0.9%) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
