On 06.12.2010 03:45, David Rhodus wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:50:44PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Alex Kozlov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:03:50AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
.xz smaller than .gz, but effective is about 96.2%:-(.
A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal message .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved
On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .
The mount LOR is well known. The duplicate lock held WITNESS warning with
em(4) might be of interest though.
Thanks,
-Garrett___
fr
Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper:
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
>
>> A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .
>
>The mount LOR is well known.
I see that this is the standard response to lot's of LOR reports. It seems to
be one o
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Alexander Motin wrote:
Does mpd work in -current ? Last tried I, netgraph had problems with mpd.
Sure it does! What is the problem?
There have been several reports (incl. panics) on various lists like
net, stable, ... during the last months for mostly 8.x (and HEAD).
None
2010/12/7 Erik Cederstrand :
>
> Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper:
>
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .
>>
>> The mount LOR is well known.
>
> I see that this is the standard response to lot
On Monday, December 06, 2010 7:11:28 pm David Xu wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:18:29 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> >> Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
> >> change that has broken process accounting/timing.
> >>
> >> laptop:kargl[42] foreach i ( 0 1
On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> I see these errors when tar (not limited to but including the version
> from FreeBSD -current)
>
> # bsdtar -xf ~/arch.tgz
> ./: Attempt to write to an empty file
> ./.cpan/: Attempt to write to an empty file
> ./.cpan/CPAN/: Attempt to write
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:50:44 -0800
Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >> Some time ago I do similar tests. Changing compression for base man's to
> >> bz2 or xz doesn't make much sense.
> > Oh, agreed. The issue with small files is that they will always take up at
> > least one sector [*]; different compress
On 12/7/10 3:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/12/7 Erik Cederstrand:
Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .
The mount LOR is well known.
I see that this is the stand
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:50:44PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> It might make sense if XZ decompression were significantly
>> faster than GZip decompression. (Especially since man pages
>> are decompressed much more often than they are compressed.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/7/10 3:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> 2010/12/7 Erik Cederstrand:
>>>
>>> Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper:
>>>
On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol
Sanliturk wrote:
> A Dmesg.TXT is attached havin
John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, December 06, 2010 7:11:28 pm David Xu wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:18:29 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
Sometime in the last 7-10 days, some one made a
change that has broken process accounting/timing.
laptop:kargl[42] foreach i ( 0 1 2 3
14 matches
Mail list logo
