Re: ascii art in hosts.allow

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000 01:46:01 CST, Kevin Day wrote: > A more direct patch would have been: > > -# NOTE: The hosts.deny file is not longer used. Instead, put both 'allow' > +# NOTE: The hosts.deny file is no longer used. Instead, put both 'allow' I'm concerned about the authenticity of this c

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

I have the same problem: [anders@enterprise:anders] $ dmesg | grep ata ata-pci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 ata-isa0: already registered as ata0 ata0-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata0-slave: identify failed -- Anders Andersson

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

It seems Anders Andersson wrote: > I have the same problem: > > [anders@enterprise:anders] $ dmesg | grep ata > ata-pci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 > on pci0 > ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 > ata-isa0: already registered as ata0 > ata0-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr > at

OpenSSL docs for FAQ

Can people please review this for style and content, for inclusion in the FAQ? I'll also need someone to mark it up once it's ready since SGML is currently not among my abilities :-) Thanks, Kris As of FreeBSD 4.0, the OpenSSL toolkit is a part of the base system. OpenSSL [http://www.openss

Re: connectivity problems with current.freebsd.org

On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:59PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > By chance, playing around with the fact that current.freebsd.org is an > alias for usw2.freebsd.org, I found that usw3.freebsd.org (209.180.6.227) > mirrors snapshots as well. Perhaps something should be added to the > /snaps

pcm - stutters

The output of my ESS 1869 stutters whenever there is no new data fed to it. For example pressing Ctrl-Z, or heavy disk usage (normally making mpg123 jump). The stuttering is repetition of one short fragment of about a quarter of a second, indefinitely Anything I can try with this machine curren

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/usb ugen.c

> One other lingering issue - I don't believe we install any of the USB > header files (in particular, /sys/dev/usb/usb.h) in /usr/include. While > I certainly have /usr/src populated on my box, we probably ought to not > require it. > > Should it be installed in /usr/include/dev/usb/*.h? Hm, y

Re: APM still ignoring DEVICE_SUSPEND errors

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message Nick Hibma writes: > : The following patch fixes two things: First, DEVICE_SUSPEND errors are > : no longer ignored. Since we have defaults for methods we should no > : longer ignore these err

Re: 4.0-release (ports) schedule

On 24/01 20:50, Alexander Langer wrote: > Just FYI, maybe you can do something against this strict handling. > Or not, I don't know. Somehow, it's very good that the compiler does > this... Ports with such sloppy code should be patched as part of the port process, or better, have the original au

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 09:40:11AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote: > I have the same problem: > > [anders@enterprise:anders] $ dmesg | grep ata > ata-pci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 > on pci0 > ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 > ata-isa0: already registered as ata0 > ata0-slave: ata_comma

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE vs PR patches

On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 10:54:46PM -0500, Danny J. Zerkel wrote: > While I don't have much time to hack, I have tried to spend a little > time > going through the open PRs. When I find something I can reproduce, > I try > to fix it. How can I get the patches I have submitted into 4.0? Some > of

Re: Please help spread the CVSup mirror load more evenly

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > This does not need to really be a wrapper around cvs, folks should run > a tool 1 time to pick the best guess as to what server they should be > using, stick that value in thier cvsup file and be done with it. If > jdp calls for a ``this server is b

Re: 4.0-release (ports) schedule

Thus spake Michael VanLoon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > What would you do about it? The C++ standard says that's an error. So, > it's an error. It's not "too strict" -- it's exactly the right amount of > strictness to conform to the standard. Yes. That's what I meant with "Somehow, it's very good .

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE vs patches to lpr/lpc

On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:33:06PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :Could someone commit the 2-line bug fix in bin/15728 before yet > :another system release goes out the door? > > Done! Ahha, saves me doing it :) Tnx, Joe -- Josef KarthauserFreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll s

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE vs patches to lpr/lpc

If it's easy I'll look at it. (I made a commit to lpr myself last week anyway.) Joe On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 05:08:56PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > > On the 29th of January, I'll be freezing the -current branch (well, > > > OK, the tru

Re: APM still ignoring DEVICE_SUSPEND errors

> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message Nick Hibma writes: > > : The following patch fixes two things: First, DEVICE_SUSPEND errors are > > : no longer ignored. Since we have defaults for methods we should no > > : longer igno

Re: 4.0-release (ports) schedule

Thus spake David O'Brien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I noticed that many ports are broken because the compiler handles > > ANSI-C++ violations too strict. > Not too strict -- to the ratified ISO-C++ specification. Yes. Ok :-) > Nope. Those programs that aren't buildable aren't C++. I will not br

How can I use current release of FreeBSD?

Hello! I'd like to use current release of 4.0 FreeBSD, because I have two PC with Ultra DMA 66 disks . I got the 4.0-2110 directoty tree from ftp://current.freebsd.org and install this release to the first host. It work properly. But I don't install it to second one because kernel doesn't se

Re: big files, blocking in inode, kern.update, and so on...

Ooops, brane fart, I meant to send this to -stable, for some reason I've been thinking that -current is production code, that's what I get for being away so long and forgetting everything On Tue, 25 Jan 19100, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Hmm. It sounds like the system is doing a huge amount of

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

At 08:19 AM 1/25/00 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > On some older PCI systems, including my Pentium 66, the driver still detects > > irq 0 for ata-pci0. Hardwiring it to irq 14 in the source as suggested recently >is the >temporary fix I'm using. > >Could you send that patch around me please ?

Re: ascii art in hosts.allow

On 25-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:03:32PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote: >> Here is a patch: (please notice the spelling correction) > > Where? I just ran ispell on src/etc/hosts.allow and it didn't catch > anything. not -> no I think.. it was more of a gramma gotcha t

Re: ascii art in hosts.allow

On 25-Jan-00 John Baldwin wrote: > > On 25-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:03:32PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote: >>> Here is a patch: (please notice the spelling correction) >> >> Where? I just ran ispell on src/etc/hosts.allow and it didn't catch >> anything. > > not -

Re: ascii art in hosts.allow

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > > What is the reason for putting a giant "Example!" in hosts.allow? > > So you'll notice that this file is an example and *demands* your > attention in configuring your system properly. Change it to hosts.allow.sample then? No hosts.allow file is e

y2k problem? naahhh...

There are some pretty funky date/times being displayed in my daily run output. Just thought I'd mention it; I've only just upgraded to 4.0-current and don't recall seeing this before. Backup passwd and group files: passwd diffs: --- /var/backups/master.passwd.bak Wed Jan 5 10:(password)

This morning's make world

I just found this in the log files for this morning's make worlds. Saludos, ed Charlie Root wrote: > cc -O -pipe -Wall -W -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c >/usr/src/usr.bin/jot/jot.c > cc -O -pipe -Wall -W -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -o jot jot.o > gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.bin

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/usb ugen.c

> > One other lingering issue - I don't believe we install any of the USB > > header files (in particular, /sys/dev/usb/usb.h) in /usr/include. While > > I certainly have /usr/src populated on my box, we probably ought to not > > require it. > > > > Should it be installed in /usr/include/dev/usb

Re: OpenSSL docs for FAQ

On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 12:49:04AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Can people please review this for style and content, for inclusion in > the FAQ? I'll also need someone to mark it up once it's ready since SGML > is currently not among my abilities :-) Is this FAQ material, or better off in the in

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

It seems Greg Childers wrote: > Hope this helps! It may be helping you, but everyone having more than the ATA chip on the motherboard is going to be bitten severely by this as the interrupt for the primary channel on all controllers are now hardwired to irq 14. What does the Detected irq: say on

Re: APM still ignoring DEVICE_SUSPEND errors

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mitsuru IWASAKI writes: : > > Any reason to not shoot the apm_hook_{suspend,resume} in the head and : > > just use newbus suspend/resume everywhere? : > : > Are there any non-newbus devices which need suspend/resume? I think the : > i386 clock uses the apm hooks bu

Re: OpenSSL docs for FAQ

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Nik Clayton wrote: > Is this FAQ material, or better off in the installation section of the > Handbook? I'd veer towards the Handbook myself. Seemed like a potential Frequently Asked Question to me, is all. I defer to your superior knowledge of our documentation standards :

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/usb ugen.c

> > One problem is how to limit the number of header files copied there. > > Only usb.h, usbdi.h, usbdi_util.h and usbdevs.h should be copied there, > > and not the other 453 header files in src/sys/dev/usb. > > Just as one data point, I only needed usb.h. On the other hand, I think > that hid.h

Re: y2k problem? naahhh...

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are some pretty funky date/times being displayed in my daily run > output. Just thought I'd mention it; I've only just upgraded to > 4.0-current and don't recall seeing this before. > > > Backup passwd and group

Re: bzip2 in src tree

> Again, lemmie get on my soap box, and ask have you looked at the man page, > and compared the memory required when using -s to the memory required by > gzip? Actually, lemmie get on my soap box and ask have you measured the time that bunzip2 takes to run? While it does give better compression

Re: y2k problem? naahhh...

On 25-Jan-00 John Polstra wrote: > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Andy Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> There are some pretty funky date/times being displayed in my daily run >> output. Just thought I'd mention it; I've only just upgraded to >> 4.0-current and don't recall seeing t

Re: connectivity problems with current.freebsd.org

At 01:03 AM 1/25/00 -0800, Bill Swingle wrote: >On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:59PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > By chance, playing around with the fact that current.freebsd.org is an > > alias for usw2.freebsd.org, I found that usw3.freebsd.org (209.180.6.227) > > mirrors snapshots as well.

make release failure

make release fails on "make world" with: + make world -- >>> elf make world started on Tue Jan 25 18:53:25 GMT 2000 -- !

Re: make release failure

> > make release fails on "make world" with: > > !! > >>> You must define the value of USA_RESIDENT as 'YES' or > >>> 'NO' as appropriate, in the environment or /etc/make.conf > >>> before building can proceed. > !!!

Re: connectivity problems with current.freebsd.org

Bill Swingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-current: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:43:59PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> By chance, playing around with the fact that current.freebsd.org is an >> alias for usw2.freebsd.org, I found that usw3.freebsd.org (209.180.6.227) >> mirro

Re: make release failure

Bruce Burden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > make release fails on "make world" with: > > > > !! > > >>> You must define the value of USA_RESIDENT as 'YES' or > > >>> 'NO' as appropriate, in the environment or /etc/make.conf > > >>

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

At 09:47 01/25/2000 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: >It seems Anders Andersson wrote: >> I have the same problem: >> >> [anders@enterprise:anders] $ dmesg | grep ata >> ata-pci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 >> on pci0 >> ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 >> ata-isa0: already registered as ata0

locking problem FreeBSD 3.4 - kermit and mgetty

C-Kermit 7.0.196 Beta.11, 6 Dec 1999, for FreeBSD 3.0 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.21-Jul24 FreeBSD 3.4 I had running kermit and mgetty running happily together, one not disturbing the other (I had a mgetty running on cuaa1 (/etc/ttys)) and when I hand dialed via kermit mgetty got poli

make world failed at usr.bin/kdump

===> usr.bin/kdump cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/us

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

It seems Tom Embt wrote: > Don't mean to butt in here, I haven't really been following the thread - > but I may have found a workaround/clue. I have a Sony CDU-55E (ooold 2x) > on secondary master of the PIIX4 on my BP6. By going into the BIOS (the > section of it where you would set CHS numbers

Re: connectivity problems with current.freebsd.org

> I'm sure this is a silly question, but then why does usw3 appear to _be_ a > mirror? Why have usw3 at all? It's NOT a mirror and I really wish people would stop jumping to conclusions with tenuous data because it's really very simple and not like anyone is currently speculating: 1. There is

Re: pcm - stutters

Nick Hibma wrote: > The output of my ESS 1869 stutters whenever there is no new data fed to > it. For example pressing Ctrl-Z, or heavy disk usage (normally making > mpg123 jump). The stuttering is repetition of one short fragment of > about a quarter of a second, indefinitely I can confirm thi

building modules

I'm trying to figure out how to make a makefile to build a module and have run into something I do not understand. I am working with freshly cvsup'ed sources. When I try to build a module in /sys/modules, the command line contains a -DKERNEL, which I find in bsd.kmod.mk. This causes the wrong d

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

It seems Alex wrote: > Speaking of identify failed, I get the following: > > ata-pci0: port 0xfcf0-0xfcff at device > 1.1 on pci0 > ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 > ata1 at 0x0170 irq 15 on ata-pci0 > > ... > > ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr > ata1-slave: identify failed

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

Speaking of identify failed, I get the following: ata-pci0: port 0xfcf0-0xfcff at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 ata1 at 0x0170 irq 15 on ata-pci0 ... ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata1-slave: identify failed ad0: 6194MB disk at ata0 as master mode UD

Re: ipfilter and ipfstat

On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:02:26AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Okay, so I finally decided to take the plunge and check out ipfilter. ipf > seemed to load my ruleset with no problems, but ipfstat dies with: > > ioctl(SIOCGETFS): Invalid argument And what would that ruleset be? -- Giorgos Ke

Re: y2k problem? naahhh...

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Backup passwd and group files: > >> passwd diffs: > >> --- /var/backups/master.passwd.bak Wed Jan 5 10:(password):41 2000 > >> +++ /etc/master.passwd Tue Jan 25 15:(password):44 2000 > >> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > >> +# $FreeBSD:(password):09:07 pe

Re: make release failure

On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0500, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > Yes, but $CHROOTDIR/etc is populated by "make installworld" when I do Why not just set USA_RESIDENT in your environment before starting `make release'? -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: make release failure

"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:54:13PM -0500, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > > Yes, but $CHROOTDIR/etc is populated by "make installworld" when I do > > Why not just set USA_RESIDENT in your environment before starting > `make release'? That's certainly possible

newpcm: ESS1688, simplex problems, stuttering

I've just upgraded my wheezing P120Mhz Dell Lattitude LM to a recent -current (Jan24 snap) & the sound *almost* works! The first problem I had was to get the card recognized. I needed to patch the sbc bridge driver to recognize the ESS 1688: Index: sys/dev/sound/isa/sbc.c =

groff(troff) y2k problem

I think, we should fix groff y2k problem before 4.0-Release time. # Also see the bottom line of `man hosts.equiv` ;), and # PRs gnu/4930, gnu/8321, bin/9502. GNU groff 1.15 has been already fixed for y2k. But groff imported in -current seems to have a y2k bug again. ;) Macros expect number reg

Re: y2k problem? naahhh...

On 25-Jan-00 Andy Farkas wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> Backup passwd and group files: >> >> passwd diffs: >> >> --- /var/backups/master.passwd.bak Wed Jan 5 10:(password):41 2000 >> >> +++ /etc/master.passwd Tue Jan 25 15:(password):44 2000 >> >> @@ -1,3

scanner stopps working under stable?

I recently (this morning, I believe) cvsup'd and my scanner stopped working. Usually, scanimage recognises /dev/scanner which is a link to /dev/pass4 ... which is my scanner. I noticed several interesting things. If I connect the scanner to another SCSI bus (I have two), then camcontrol rescan

Re: pcm - stutters

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Donn Miller wrote: > Nick Hibma wrote: > > > The output of my ESS 1869 stutters whenever there is no new data fed to > > it. For example pressing Ctrl-Z, or heavy disk usage (normally making > > mpg123 jump). The stuttering is repetition of one short fragment of > > about a

Re: grep --binary-files=without-match (fwd)

hi, there! can we merge this when it's ready before freeze? -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 100 22:47:26 -0500 (EST) From: Alain Magloire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: grep --binary-files=wi

not recognize dos partition

Hello, I made boot.flp/mfsroot.flp from 1/24/2000 snapshots. I have 50MB dos partition on top of my 20GB disk. Installing step from these stops on "Prooving Devices ..." step. Last message on console shows dos partition has founded on /dev/ad0s1, no more message shown. -- Keizo SHIMIZU ($B@6?e

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

Soren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Alex wrote: > > Speaking of identify failed, I get the following: > > > > ata-pci0: port 0xfcf0-0xfcff at device > > 1.1 on pci0 > > ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 > > ata1 at 0x0170 irq 15 on ata-pci0 > > > > ... > > > > ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout wait

Re: ipfilter and ipfstat

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, the Webslave wrote: > > Okay, so I finally decided to take the plunge and check out ipfilter. ipf > > seemed to load my ruleset with no problems, but ipfstat dies with: > > > > ioctl(SIOCGETFS): Invalid argument > > And what would that ruleset be? > # Default to deny bloc

panic in dev/usb/usbdi.c

I found I got panic at boot time if I defined "options DIAGNOSTIC". - console panic: ohci_abort_req in interrput context Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x35: movb$0,in_Debugger.354 - This messages is printed by usbd_do_request_flags() in line 928 of dev/usb/usbdi.c. --

Re: FIC SD-11 not happy with ata

%> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: %> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: %> %> %> %> %> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now: %... % %> %> )(*&$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test %> things like IO... gr % %We in the computer hardware business

Re: FIC SD-11 not happy with ata

> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: > %> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: > %> %> %> > %> %> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now: > %... > % > %> > %> )(*&$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test > %> things like IO... gr > % > %We in the comp

Re: building modules

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian Beattie wrote: > I'm trying to figure out how to make a makefile to build a module and have > run into something I do not understand. I am working with freshly > cvsup'ed sources. > > When I try to build a module in /sys/modules, the command line contains a > -DKERNEL

Speaking of ATAisms...

I haven't been able to mount an msdos (FAT16) formattted zip disk (well any FAT16 formatted zip disk) for quite a while. Currently I'm trying to mount afd0s4, but no such luck (I think the latest error is something about reading the partition table). The wd driver used to grok the same disks. A

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready, (.. and no sound with cmi8330)

Last weekend i tried patches from Soren Schmidt to reactivate my old cdrom which went away after the ata-update around the 18. January. This patches completely broke ata support for me (that means the kernel did not boot anymore). Of course i reported this one or two days later. Now an equivalen

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready, (.. and no sound with cmi8330)

It seems F. Heinrichmeyer wrote: > Last weekend i tried patches from Soren Schmidt to reactivate my old > cdrom which went away after the ata-update around the 18. January. This > patches completely broke ata support for me (that means the kernel did > not boot anymore). Of course i reported this

Re: My ATAPI CD not come ready

It seems Alex wrote: > > You need to update.. > > > OK - I've just updated. Here goes again: > > ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr > ata1-slave: identify failed > ad0: 6194MB [13424/15/63] at ata0-master using > UDMA33 > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master using PIO4 > Mounting root

Re: Speaking of ATAisms...

It seems Alex Zepeda wrote: > I haven't been able to mount an msdos (FAT16) formattted zip disk (well > any FAT16 formatted zip disk) for quite a while. Currently I'm trying to > mount afd0s4, but no such luck (I think the latest error is something > about reading the partition table). The wd dr

Re: Speaking of ATAisms...

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote: > I still have that on my list, but I've not gotten down to it yet, sorry... Well as long as I've got the wd driver, I'm fine. Anything in perticular where I might be able to help in fixing this? > > P.S. Soren, thanks for the burncd program. So far

Re: Speaking of ATAisms...

It seems Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > I still have that on my list, but I've not gotten down to it yet, sorry... > > Well as long as I've got the wd driver, I'm fine. > > Anything in perticular where I might be able to help in fixing this? You could try

Re: Speaking of ATAisms...

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote: > You could try to do a dd of the first say 2 cyls of the ZIP with > both drivers and check is they are different, they shouldn't be... How many bytes is this again? > > Well I haven't updated my kernel yet. *grin* > > Yeah, progress does have its vict

Re: [ID 20000124.004] "perl in malloc(): warning: recursive call"on

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Lars Eggert wrote: > Ilya, > > thanks for the quick response. > > > Signals and Perl do not mix. Please do not use signals if a segfault > > is not a desirable form of output. > > Never? After reading perlipc I was under the impression that using signals > was okay if you

Re: [ID 20000124.004] "perl in malloc(): warning: recursive call" on

On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 02:44:05PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Lars Eggert wrote: > > > Ilya, > > > > thanks for the quick response. > > > > > Signals and Perl do not mix. Please do not use signals if a segfault > > > is not a desirable form of output. > > > > Never? Afte

Re: [ID 20000124.004] "perl in malloc(): warning: recursive call"on

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 02:44:05PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Lars Eggert wrote: > > > > > Ilya, > > > > > > thanks for the quick response. > > > > > > > Signals and Perl do not mix. Please do not use signals if a segfault

Re: indirection in bus space

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luoqi Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think it is difficult to implement such conversion because: > > > > - Not only bus space stuff also resource manager stuff need to > > perform such conversion. > > Why? Both bus_space_handle_t and bus_space_tag_t

Re: BPF bug or not?

On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO wrote: > All, > > I've just found that read from /dev/bpfX never return EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK. > It means that when you do a non blocking read and there is no data you will > always get 0. > > Does it suppose work this way? I think it is a bug. Per