On 20.06.21 07:40, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
Hello Peter,
Which leads to your (2), but thing is, modern boost sort of requires
C++11. Might be other external modules do, too.
Might that switch to C++11 be overdue?
I would like to switch. I am a big fan of C++11, but I am worried on the
impac
On 20.06.21 08:57, Don Lewis wrote:
On 20 Jun, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
Hello Peter,
You are right on both issues, of course.
To be fair, on your (1), I didn't touch that
variable check, I just brute-forced the C++11
mode of compilation.
Which leads to your (2), but thing is, modern
boost so
leginee commented on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864513194
Then we have 2 choices. Fix the Issues or prepare the switch to a
replacement.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
Right, understandable.
Only I believe there's need to consider also
that the newer GCC (10.3.0 in my case) can't
(won't?) compile even the headers-only part of
older boost (1.55, the internal one).
Maybe there're issues with other libraries
frozen at their older versions, too.
-Yury
ardovm commented on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285
The first two warnings are IMHO bugs. The first one is a function parameter
type `bool` instead of `bool&` and the second is a mixup of return values in a
`switch` statement.
ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285
The first two warnings are IMHO bugs. The first one is a function parameter
type `bool` instead of `bool&` and the second is a mixup of return values in a
`switch` statem
Hi Arrigo, all
Development seems to be quite live at
https://github.com/silnrsi/graphite
Regards,
Pedro
> On 06/20/2021 9:08 PM GitBox wrote:
>
>
> ardovm edited a comment on pull request #133:
> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/133#issuecomment-864605285
>
>
>The first t
On 20 Jun, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Arrigo, all
>
> Development seems to be quite live at
> https://github.com/silnrsi/graphite
We are using SIL Graphite, http://silgraphite.sourceforge.net/
Looking at the Graphite technical overview page mentioned here:
https://github.com/silnrsi/graphite/blob/
