On 20.06.21 08:57, Don Lewis wrote:
On 20 Jun, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
Hello Peter,
You are right on both issues, of course.
To be fair, on your (1), I didn't touch that
variable check, I just brute-forced the C++11
mode of compilation.
Which leads to your (2), but thing is, modern
boost sort of requires C++11. Might be other
external modules do, too.
Might that switch to C++11 be overdue?
What I consider the nicest result (beyond the
'fact of the pudding') is seeing that the C++11
build is achievable with very minimal changes to
the source, which wouldn't (shouldn't?) reflect
on builds with older versions of GCC.
I think that we still need to do release builds of 4.1.x on CentOS 5. Is
it's version of gcc new enough?
Redhat 5 uses GCC 3.4 according to [1]
CentOS 7 uses gcc 4.4.7
If I check with [2] it is to old.
[1] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/19458
[2] https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support
--
This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
