Hello, everyone.
I'm having problems installing texlive in my PC. I'm using unstable
here.
Everything started a couple of days ago, when I needed the package
physics.sty. I had to install texlive-science. But dependences came
in, and somehow I got a lot of configuration errors, and installation
w
El jue, 14 oct 2021 a las 12:46, The Wanderer () escribió:
>
> On 2021-10-14 at 10:57, Victor Hugo Muñoz wrote:
>
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > I'm having problems installing texlive in my PC. I'm using unstable
> > here.
>
> That may be the root
El jue, 14 oct 2021 a las 13:35, Andrew M.A. Cater
() escribió:
>>
> It might be worth checking what packages you have installed. If you
> can manage to, uninstall them (or use dpkg --purge to purge texlive-base
> then retry.
Thanks for the idea. It didn't work. texlive-base is not installed, so
p
El jue, 14 oct 2021 a las 13:46, David Wright
() escribió:
>
> I'm still running buster, but what that /looks/ like to me is that
> you're running a version of dpkg that is, as yet, ignorant of the
> ?new flags in packages' lists of conffiles.
>
> I say flags, but the only one defined is exactly th
El vie, 15 oct 2021 a las 10:20, Greg Wooledge () escribió:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:56:25AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > Packages are not allowed to use dpkg features that are not present in
> > stable.
> >
> > In this particular case, according to the changelog 'dpkg' introduced
> >
El lun, 18 oct 2021 a las 9:07, Andrei POPESCU
() escribió:
>
> On Vi, 15 oct 21, 10:39:54, Victor Hugo Muñoz wrote:
> >
> > Actually, yes. Why? Due to confinement, my home PC has also been my
> > office PC. And
> > since I had a working machine, decided to upgrade
6 matches
Mail list logo
