Agree, first it should be deprecated. сб, 18 июн. 2022 г. в 15:12, Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de>: > > Am 17.06.22 um 20:55 schrieb Sergey Belyashov: > > Imho, it is better to break the use of __at <num> in favor of __at(<num>). > > > > While that might be a clenaer solution, and was my first intuition, I > think that this would break too much existing user code (and more > importantly, third-party code that users haven't written themselves, > such as device-specific headers). Even if we do want to go that way, we > IMO should first deprecate the non-parenthesized version, emit a warning > in one release, then remove it in a following release. > > Philipp > > > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdcc-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel
_______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
