Am 17.06.22 um 20:55 schrieb Sergey Belyashov:
Imho, it is better to break the use of __at <num> in favor of __at(<num>).
While that might be a clenaer solution, and was my first intuition, I think that this would break too much existing user code (and more importantly, third-party code that users haven't written themselves, such as device-specific headers). Even if we do want to go that way, we IMO should first deprecate the non-parenthesized version, emit a warning in one release, then remove it in a following release.
Philipp _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
