On 30.07.2016 09:03, alvin albrecht wrote: > > Sometime after #9676 and up to and including #9682, I am seeing an > increase in z80 binary sizes of 25% in some compiles. It seems to be > connected to increase spill to the stack and higher use of index > registers in accessing stack variables. I will try to look closer to > nail down what it is but I am wondering if anyone else is seeing this. > > > I can give a link to before and after list files showing asm generated > by #9676 vs #9692 for a particular case of a binary increasing from 39k > to 51k.
There was a bug in the fix for bug #2467. I fixed it in rev #9705. can you check if that solves the code size regression for you? Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
