On 30.07.2016 10:02, Erik Petrich wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, alvin albrecht wrote: > >> >> >> Sometime after #9676 and up to and including #9682, I am seeing an >> increase >> in z80 binary sizes of 25% in some compiles. It seems to be connected to >> increase spill to the stack and higher use of index registers in >> accessing >> stack variables. I will try to look closer to nail down what it is >> but I am >> wondering if anyone else is seeing this. >> >> >> I can give a link to before and after list files showing asm generated by >> #9676 vs #9692 for a particular case of a binary increasing from 39k >> to 51k. >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6XhJJ33xpOWLTJRTkgxRzNXQ2s/view?usp=shari >> >> ng > > Yes, I can reproduce this. It appears to be revision #9682 (the patch > associated with bug #2467) where the spill location use increases. > > Erik
Do we have a resonably small, self-contained C code example to reproduce this? Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
