>>> There really doesn't seem to be much of a point; GCC's AVR support is >>> very good these days. >> >> True, however sad it may be. > > It's sad that GCC supports AVR?
No, the first part, i.e. that that killed avr-sdcc. What a thoroughly odd thing to say. >> it's easier to >> learn to live with the limitations of avr-gcc. > > What limitations? I use it every day at work, it works great for me. There was no support for memory classes aka named address space until recent changes, it still does not properly support generic address space, support for the bigger memory parts sucks. Besides it's hard to push through changes (this issue has many facets I won't discuss here) and mere users' requests are generally seen as annoyance. Atmel has hijacked it in the very same way as TI for msp-gcc (being bashed elsewhere in this thread). The documentation towards the mere uer sucks. JW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
