Here is a brief summary of work done in 1998 to compare ISO 7816-
3:1997 and EMV V3.1.1.
Attached file ISO_EMV_Comp.doc
Peter
---------------------------------------------
Forwarded by: "Post Master" <internet>
Forwarded to: PM:pwt
Date forwarded: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:22:55 +0100
Date sent: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:59:39 +0200
From: Olivier Jeannet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MUSCLE standards
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Peter W Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > I will try to find time to give detailed responses to David's frustrations,
> > but for now I generally support Matthias. Except I remind you all that
> > EMV's T=1 is different from ISO's T=1 - both have errors in the error
> > recovery, but the errors are different, and they also have different
> > definitions of the fields for changing protocol parameters.
>
> This is interesting.
> Can you give us more details about the differences between EMV's T=1 and
> ISO's T=1 ?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Olivier Jeannet - POS Servers team
> My Windoz PC didn't work well because I had not rebooted it enough...
> ***************************************************************
> Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
> (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
> http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
> ***************************************************************
>
Iosis, 34 Strathmore Road, Bristol BS7 9QJ, UK
Phone & fax +44 (0)117 951 4755
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.
---- File information -----------
File: ISO_EMV_Comp.doc
Date: 22 May 2000, 22:08
Size: 27648 bytes.
Type: MS-Word
ISO_EMV_Comp.doc
