Peter W Tomlinson wrote:
> I will try to find time to give detailed responses to David's frustrations,
> but for now I generally support Matthias. Except I remind you all that
> EMV's T=1 is different from ISO's T=1 - both have errors in the error
> recovery, but the errors are different, and they also have different
> definitions of the fields for changing protocol parameters.
This is interesting.
Can you give us more details about the differences between EMV's T=1 and
ISO's T=1 ?
Regards,
--
Olivier Jeannet - POS Servers team
My Windoz PC didn't work well because I had not rebooted it enough...
***************************************************************
Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
***************************************************************
