It could feasably fit well. I don't know how we would specify which reader to
use in the CT-API though. Although int ctn is the Card Terminal number. Isn't
this only if you have multiple readers on the same device ? We would have to
come up with a numbering convention.
Thanks
Dave
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, you wrote:
>Gregor,
>
>Would it be against OSI model if we put the IO parameters in a config
>file? I think this is better from a practical point of view than having
>two diferent shared libraries for two identical (except the IO
>initialization parameters) readers.
>
>This config file could be the same we use to tell the resource manager
>what shared library it has to load. I don't know if it would fit well,
>please opinions...
>
>Thanks,
>Carlos.
>
>***************************************************************
>Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
>(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
>http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
>***************************************************************
--
******************************************************************
David Corcoran Internet Security/Smartcards
Work: School:
205 Industrial Blvd 2252 US Highway 52 West Apt C4
Sugar Land, TX 77478 West Lafayette, IN 47906
Suggestion: Use Linux, it is for IQ's higher than 95.
Quote:
If you can't make it work, at least make it look good.
~ Bill Gates
******************************************************************
***************************************************************
Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
***************************************************************
