I agree, and will start a page with available CTAPI's so we don't repeat
names.

Dave

*************************************************************
David Corcoran                 Internet Security/Smartcards

Work:                          Home:
Schlumberger Limited           2252 US Highway 52 West
205 Industrial Blvd            West Lafayette, IN 47906
Sugar Land, TX 77478
(281) 240-7054                 (765) 463-2455

http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/corcordt
http://www.linuxnet.com

Quote: If it doesn't work, at least make it look good.
       - Bill Gates
*************************************************************

On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, gregor wrote:

> hi folx,
> 
> a few days ago david rn into trouble loading diffrent libs.
> if we talk about a resource manager, we should also talk about a naming-convention 
>for
> ct-api's.
> this is my suggestion:
> a ct-api should named like this:
> 
> ctapi-nnnnn.xyy.so
> 
> where n is a "well know identifier"
> x the major-no of the release
> y the minor-no of the release
> 
> 
> here is an example. my ct-api is for mct which follows spec v0.9
> and it's release 1.00
> so i would name my ct-api:
> 
> ctapi-mct09.100.so
> 
> so i think we need also some kind of nameing authority. this sound bigger that it 
>is. we
> only need someone who put all the diffrent names to public and looks that there are 
>no
> doubles.
> 
> so let me know what do you all think about that
> 
> 
> bye gregor
> 
> 
> ***************************************************************
> Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
> (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
> http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
> ***************************************************************
> 

***************************************************************
Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
***************************************************************

Reply via email to