john smith <qweqweqwe314...@gmail.com> writes: > *snip* bunch of text
No offense, but the scripts (I just got done looking through them) leave tons of loose ends that would more likely hurt rather than help a random user who ran them. They make tons of assumptions about directories and binaries existing on a user's system, without proper safeguards / defensive programming around the different commands prior to running. I think if you spent all your time on those emails enhancing the scripts instead, they probably could have been in a state that was good enough to be accepted by now. - my 2c -- Matthew Carter (m...@ahungry.com) http://ahungry.com
