On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:34 -0500, Stephen H. Dawson wrote: > Well, I am concerned I could miss something using the local spam filter. > I guess I will have to stay with that approach. Thanks for the input, > much appreciated.
As mentioned here: > On 02/17/2014 12:18 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > > That leaves [...] (b) daily reports of mail that needs moderation > > from the GNU lists: if I get this email then something I thought was > > spam was not considered spam by the GNU list spam detector. In that > > case I go handle it. Since I always see the daily notifications the longest I could miss something would be a day, even if I didn't notice it in my spam folder. And of course this is only for people who are not subscribed since once they subscribe and post their first "non-spam" email, I un-moderate them. In reality since I've trained my filter (I use bogofilter) I find I very, very rarely get false positives (or negatives).
