On 02/07/2011 12:27 AM, Karl Berry wrote: > To avoid doubling the documentation burden, and yet allowing sharing the > documentation with other FDL-using manuals (the goal for savannah), I > recommend dual-licensing under both FDLv1.3+ and AGPLv3+. > > To do this, given that the doc sources are entwined with the source > code, the easiest way I know of is to make a separate statement in the > README (or some such) that the documentation parts of the sources are > licensed under the GFDL. And the regular GFDL notice should be included > in the generated documentation.
Thanks for your response, I'll dual-license the documentation parts.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
