On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:39:13AM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > > Your proposal sounds good to me. After looking at our > > method of decommissioning, do you propose any changes in it? > > The method looks good to me. > Except this point: > > - savannah: status=orphaned; note in summary. > > That only makes sense for packages that 1) have functional source code > and 2) have been decomissioned due to lack of maintenance. IMO we > should not be looking for maintainers otherwise. ("orphaned" implies are > looking for someone to take care of them.)
We could add a Savannah status like 'decommissioned' or what would fit it better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature