Luis Falcon wrote: > Things can be done at server side, but we would need to have admin > access to the Hg server, which is not the idea.
I guess I don't understand then. Because we have admin access to the hg server on Savannah's vcs system. But you say that is not the idea. Therefore I don't understand. > The Weblate hosting has the possibility of specifying the branch, so at > least at that level we minimize the issue. I guess I have no idea what "Weblate hosting" hosting is and assumed it was some type of template you were using. > As I mentioned to Andrew Engelbrecht, who also wrote me about this, we > would need to have a greater control. For instance, having some sort > of ACL per resource (mailing list, bug tracker, tasks, repos...) > > Also, it would be great to be able to create more repositories per > project. That will help a lot. AFAIK, we are limited to one repo per > project. Is it possible today to have multiple repositories? I know very little about hg. But in git it is definitely possible to have multiple respositories per project. We put then in a subdirectory named after the project. So for instance 'guix' has multiple projects in the subdirectory. I can only assume that hg allows similar capability. I look in the /srv/hg/ and /srv/hg/health/ directories and it looks like for hg we would need a convention of some sort. /srv/hg/foo-dir/ or something. Hmm... Is GNU Health even using Savannah hg repositories? I had assumed so since you had asked about it in the savannah-hackers list. Bob
