Hello, On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Richard Stallman <r...@gnu.org> wrote: [...] > It seems to me that this has a flaw: maybe it should require that > licensing be compatible either with GPL 3-or-later or with AGPL > 3-or-later. [...] > Are there any packages which are licenses under GPL 2 only > or GPL 3 only, or anything else not compatible with 3-or-later?
The guidelines I'm familiar with is that "or-later" is required for all projects hosted on Savannah. Project which are "GPL N only" are not accepted (at least since August 2014, when I joined). This is mentioned on this page: http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly/ "Use a license compatible with the GNU GPL, and use the "or any later version" formulation in your license notices." And detailed here: http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/GnuGplTwoOrLater/ We point to these pages when asking the submitter to amend their project's license. Does this answer your concern ? regards, - assaf
