On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, m. allan noah <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is fairly normal for low-end scanners to do many features in > software. Given the price of the scanner in question, i would expect > it to be a little smarter than that. The size of your pcap files > should vary as you change the x/y values. I will also be more > explicit- there is no reason to assume the canon proprietary sane > driver fully exercises the capabilities of the machine. I would expect > the windows driver to be more complete. > I think the DR-9050C is the "low-end" of the DR series. At least my client bought it because they wanted a less expensive back up for their DR-9080s. And yes, I figured the Windows driver would be better. I've been resisting setting up VirtualBox and a Windows VM because I dislike Windows and it seems like an annoying level of effort. I'm going to give USBlyser a spin first. -Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20120817/cae9c92b/attachment-0001.html>
