Already tried.100% same log (see cut-paste below). :(
"h-3.2# export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11sh-3.2# scanimage >foooo.pnm[sanei_debug] 
Setting debug level of pixma to 11.[pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread 
support.[pixma] pixma version 0.16.2[pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon 
imageClass MF6500 at libusb:005:002-04a9-2686-00-00[pixma] 
sanei_bjnp_find_devices:[pixma] Added all configured scanners, now do auto 
detection...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 
is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] gif0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] stf0 
is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is 
IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is 
not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] gif0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] stf0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 
is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] en1 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..[pixma] lo0 is not a 
valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is 
not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] gif0 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] stf0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is 
not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..[pixma] 
lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] gif0 
is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] stf0 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is 
not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is IPv4 capable, sending 
broadcast..[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is 
not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] lo0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] gif0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] stf0 
is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 
interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, 
skipping...[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...[pixma] en1 is 
IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..[pixma] scanner discovery finished...[pixma] 
pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devicessh-3.2# "
Twain28

Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:32:29 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org

So complete different behaviour here than on Linux. 
 
And does the scanimage > foo.pnm with the same export statement give more 
information ?


2010/6/17 <twain43 at hotmail.com>


Here's the pixma trace log....but I'm afraid it reports nothing more than it 
did last time.... 


Twain28



                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Tutto lo spazio che ti serve, Hotmail va oltre i 5GB
http://www.windowslive.it/hotmail/SpazioDisponibile.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100617/77f47593/attachment.htm>

Reply via email to