Dnia 2009-07-06, pon o godzinie 00:16 +0200, Alessandro Zummo pisze:
> On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:31:12 +0200
> Dominik Wnek <dominalien at netscape.net> wrote:
>
> > Dnia 2009-07-05, nie o godzinie 12:26 +0200, Alessandro Zummo pisze:
> > > On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:50:24 +0200
> > > Dominik Wnek <dominalien at netscape.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scanning at 2400 dpi via USB works. I'd attach the log but it turned out
> > > > at 14 MB. Let me know if you want it.
> > >
> > > please capture it at debug level 32, it should be enough
> > >
> > Attaching log at debug level 32 from command:
> >
> > scanimage -x 100 -y 5 --resolution 2400 2>scanimage_2400_usb_px700w.log
> >
> > Scanning over USB, seems successful.
I.
> looks good. may I have a log of a network scan with the same debug
> level and scanimage parameters?
>
Here you go. Scanner locked up nice and pretty.
Dominik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scanimage_2400_net_px700w.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 20555 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090706/90f9959a/attachment.bin>
