Hi Nicolas, I'm sure that this was a 2 page scan. However, I created a new log file as you proposed. It's much smaller and I left all the information in the log.
This is the command I used: scanimage --mode=Color --source='Automatic Document Feeder' -y 5 -l 0 --resolution=300 -x 5 -t 0 --batch --progress --batch-count=3 > tmp/scantest -v Please let me know if you need anything else -- Pascal Nicolas wrote: > Yes, this is exactly what is needed, but looks like there's only a > single page scan here. > > Could you produce a same trace (but select a _small_ scan area for > smaller log size) of a 2 page ADF scan with the issue you get. > > Note that I'll commit very soon some changes that have been tweaked with > a MX850 (but should suit MX310 as well) that enhances speed for ADF > scanning, and imitate exactly what the Doze driver does. I'm just > waiting to have also MP970 TPU scan almost ready. > > Nicolas > > Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 ? 02:03 +0200, Pascal Seiler a ?crit : >> Not sure about the difference, but now it has worked. >> >> See the attached file for the output >> >> Pascal >> >> Nicolas wrote: >>> Strange. >>> >>> I did exactly the same as you did, and I get those lines from the >>> backend (When I start Xsane from a client), which are inserted in the >>> log you sent: >>> >>> [saned] process_request: waiting for request >>> [saned] process_request: got request 1 >>> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 10. >>> [pixma] pixma version 0.14.5 >>> [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon PIXMA MP610 at libusb:001:004 >>> [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices >>> [saned] process_request: waiting for request >>> [saned] process_request: got request 2 >>> [saned] process_request: access to resource `pixma' granted >>> [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon PIXMA MP610 at libusb:001:004 >>> [pixma] pixma_open(): Canon PIXMA MP610 >>> [pixma] OUT T=0.494 len=16 >>> [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 >>> [pixma] >>> [pixma] IN T=0.495 len=24 >>> [pixma] 00000000:06 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 03 00 02 >>> [pixma] 00000010:00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa >>> [pixma] >>> [pixma] Current status: paper=0 cal=0 lamp=2 busy=0 >>> [saned] process_request: sane_open returned: Success >>> [saned] process_request: waiting for request >>> [saned] process_request: got request 4 >>> >>> Could you double check, kill all running saned process, set >>> SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=10 and run again saned -d128 >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> >>> >>> Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 ? 19:36 +0200, Pascal Seiler a ?crit : >>>> Nicolas >>>> >>>> First of all, thanks for your quick answer. Unfortunately >>>> SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA gave absolutely no about at all. I then started scaned >>>> from the console with option -d128. >>>> >>>> This is the output I got: >>>> > -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: scan.log Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20081003/fa486549/attachment-0001.txt