Tymoteusz pisze: > Ren? Rebe pisze: >> Tymoteusz wrote: >>> Ren? Rebe pisze: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Tymoteusz wrote: >>>>> Ren? Rebe pisze: >>>>>> Tymoteusz wrote: >>>>>>> Rene Rebe pisze: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> m. allan noah pisze: >>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz <tymoteusz.drozd at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or >>>>>>>>>>>> variant) or even >>>>>>>>>>>> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing >>>>>>>>>>>> functionality ... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yours, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin >>>>>>>>>>>> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rene.rebe.name >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've >>>>>>>>>>> compiled old >>>>>>>>>>> sane-backends 1.0.18 >>>>>>>>>>> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for >>>>>>>>>>> now, but i >>>>>>>>>>> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway >>>>>>>>>>> to solve >>>>>>>>>>> this problem ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> allan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> bit more this issue. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >>>>>>>>>>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my >>>>>>>>> previous post >>>>>>>>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A >>>>>>>> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday >>>>>>>> found a similar >>>>>>>> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround >>>>>>>> when done. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the >>>>>>>> scanner warm >>>>>>>> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yours, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any >>>>>>> difference. >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where is the log to take a look? >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400 >>>>>> is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the >>>>>> light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend >>>>>> source you installed from contains this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yours, >>>>>> >>>>> Hmm >>>>> >>>>> AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in: >>>>> >>>>> /backend/ >>>>> 767:avision.c >>>>> 2477:avision.c >>>>> 107:avision.h >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A >>>>> 7400_old.log is previous log >>>>> 7400.log is new one. >>>>> >>>>> also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because >>>>> after 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's >>>>> committed with old version of avison). >>>> >>>> So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return >>>> SANE_STATUS_GOODM; >>>> in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c? >>>> >>>> If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as >>>> maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often. >>>> >>>> If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the >>>> sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20) >>>> fixes light detection for your scanner. >>>> >>>> Yours, >>>> >>> hmm i need some more info becuse i had >>> >>> avision.c: In function 'wait_4_light': >>> avision.c:2439: error: 'SANE_STATUS_GOODM' undeclared (first use in >>> this function) >>> >>> >>> i had puted this here: >>> >>> wait_4_light (Avision_Scanner* s) >>> { >>> return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; << >>> Avision_Device* dev = s->hw; >>> >>> /* read stuff */ >>> struct command_read rcmd; >>> >>> >>> Regards >> >> Sorry, the trailing M was a typo from my side. SANE_STATUS_GOOD >> (taking a 2nd look) it should be. >> >> Depending on your compiler you might have to move the return after >> the variable declarations ... >> >> Yours, >> > Well thats gives difference. > Scanner have moved his head and started initialization. > But then stoped. > new log (7400_1.log) is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A > > Regards > > Hello after while. I would like to ask about this problem, did there is available any fix for this yet ?
Regards
