Ren? Rebe pisze: > Tymoteusz wrote: >> Ren? Rebe pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Tymoteusz wrote: >>>> Ren? Rebe pisze: >>>>> Tymoteusz wrote: >>>>>> Rene Rebe pisze: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> m. allan noah pisze: >>>>>>>>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz <tymoteusz.drozd at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or >>>>>>>>>>> variant) or even >>>>>>>>>>> the console text terminal to check your basic image processing >>>>>>>>>>> functionality ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yours, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin >>>>>>>>>>> http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | >>>>>>>>>>> http://rene.rebe.name >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well scanimage doesn't crashing xorg. In this moment i've >>>>>>>>>> compiled old >>>>>>>>>> sane-backends 1.0.18 >>>>>>>>>> and my scaner had return to previous state, it's working for >>>>>>>>>> now, but i >>>>>>>>>> think that this situation is not so fine. Is there anyway >>>>>>>>>> to solve >>>>>>>>>> this problem ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yes- get a debug log like i asked for previously.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> allan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> when i catch some more time i will try to investigate a >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> bit more this issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel >>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" >>>>>>>>>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> oups sorry i had forgotten to add ur email adres to my previous >>>>>>>> post >>>>>>>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A >>>>>>> It is just inf. waiting for light warmup. I just yesterday found >>>>>>> a similar >>>>>>> problem with a newer hardware and will provide a workaround when >>>>>>> done. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you test if you can scan successfully if you let the scanner >>>>>>> warm >>>>>>> it's light before you scan with the Avision SANE backend? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yours, >>>>>>> >>>>>> Well i have left scanner for warmup but this didn't give any >>>>>> difference. >>>>>> Regards. >>>>> >>>>> Where is the log to take a look? >>>>> >>>>> Btw. I just noticed in the source I have on the screen the 7400 >>>>> is marked as AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS, which essentially ignores the >>>>> light warmup state in the code. Can you review if your backend >>>>> source you installed from contains this? >>>>> >>>>> Yours, >>>>> >>>> Hmm >>>> >>>> AV_LIGHT_CHECK_BOGUS appears in: >>>> >>>> /backend/ >>>> 767:avision.c >>>> 2477:avision.c >>>> 107:avision.h >>>> >>>> >>>> log is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A >>>> 7400_old.log is previous log >>>> 7400.log is new one. >>>> >>>> also i'm sure that something had triggered lamp warmup because >>>> after 40min scanner was very hot (much warmer then after 30 scan's >>>> committed with old version of avison). >>> >>> So, still waiting for the light. Can you add a return >>> SANE_STATUS_GOODM; >>> in the beginning of your wait_4_light() function in avision.c? >>> >>> If I find some time I'll send you some workaround for testing, as >>> maybe the silicon would report a correct status if polled less often. >>> >>> If you have free time you could also test upfront if changing the >>> sleep(1) that should be in your function to sleep(10) or sleep(20) >>> fixes light detection for your scanner. >>> >>> Yours, >>> >> hmm i need some more info becuse i had >> >> avision.c: In function 'wait_4_light': >> avision.c:2439: error: 'SANE_STATUS_GOODM' undeclared (first use in >> this function) >> >> >> i had puted this here: >> >> wait_4_light (Avision_Scanner* s) >> { >> return SANE_STATUS_GOODM; << >> Avision_Device* dev = s->hw; >> >> /* read stuff */ >> struct command_read rcmd; >> >> >> Regards > > Sorry, the trailing M was a typo from my side. SANE_STATUS_GOOD > (taking a 2nd look) it should be. > > Depending on your compiler you might have to move the return after > the variable declarations ... > > Yours, > Well thats gives difference. Scanner have moved his head and started initialization. But then stoped. new log (7400_1.log) is here http://atelier1.website.pl/N-A
Regards
