Alexandre, After looking at your logfiles it seems the scanner is being recognized and the options are being accepted, but its failing to find home. I think this may be a difference between the X1195 and the other X1100s. I'm not even sure it uses the same scanner chip - rts8852 (which would also explain why its not finding home). From the Lexmark website their x1100 scanner driver supports the following models:
Lexmark X1110, Lexmark X1130, Lexmark X1140, Lexmark X1150, Lexmark X1155, Lexmark X1160, Lexmark X1170, Lexmark X1180, Lexmark X1185, Lexmark X1190 The sane lexmark backend should also support these models. Since the X1195 is new, it may have a different scanner driver from Lexmark even though it is using the same usb code. Unfortunately, this means it probably won't work with the sane lexmark backend. regards, Fred Odendaal Alexandre Teixeira wrote: >Em Dom, 2005-11-06 ?s 20:54 +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz escreveu: > >Hi Henning, > >Thank you for fast reply this message... > > > >>Hi, >> >>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:12:12PM +0000, Alexandre Teixeira wrote: >> >> >>>Hi Members, >>> >>>I'm have one machine all-in-one Lexmark x1195 or x1100 series, but I >>>don't can scanning. >>> >>> >>While the X 1195 is not listed at all, itshould be detected as it has >>the same ids as the other x1100 scanners. >> >> >> >>>found USB scanner (vendor=0x043d, product=0x007c) at libusb:002:003 >>> >>> >>>[root@IS-BUILDER ~]# scanimage -L -d lexmark:libusb:002:003 >>> >>> >>This doesn't work anyway. Either use -L or -d. >> >> >Ok, sorry ;) > > > >>Just try scanning with scanimage. >> >> >> >>>But, if I running "xsane lexmark:libusb:002:003" this front-end not >>>execute preview scan, freeze application. >>> >>> >>Put "lexmark" in dll.conf. >> >>I don't know why it freezes, but a logfile could help to analyze the >>problem: >> >>export SANE_DEBUG_LEXMARK=255 >>xsane 2>log >> >>Try to run a scan or preview. If it does not work, send the log >>(compressed!). >> >> > >This command function to xsane without " lexmark:libusb:002:003", but >when I send command to scanning the reader optical don't move and >generator sound similar blocked approximately 10sec. > >In attach have log.tgz... > >Thank you. > >[]'s >Alexandre > > > >>Bye, >> Henning >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20051113/71878211/attachment.htm From plum.pudd...@free.fr Mon Nov 14 08:27:52 2005 From: plum.pudd...@free.fr (plum.pudd...@free.fr) Date: Mon Nov 14 08:27:56 2005 Subject: [sane-devel] Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem In-Reply-To: <dl8fd4$eh6$1...@sea.gmane.org> References: <4376277f.3090...@free.fr> <200511131842.26061.oliver.schwa...@gmx.de> <dl83vc$gbo$1...@sea.gmane.org> <200511132142.33203.oliver.schwa...@gmx.de> <dl8fd4$eh6$1...@sea.gmane.org> Message-ID: <1131956872.43784a8833...@imp5-g19.free.fr> Selon Jim MacLeod <j75t...@blueyonder.co.uk>: > >> I'm using the tpu on the 3490 with backend-11-10. It works ok > >> though the scans seem quite dark compared to the original slide. > >> However adjusting the gamma settings on the scanned file gives a > >> nice 1024x768 display size. I'm very much a newbie at this so sorry > >> I can't give more detailed info. > > > > Can you send me the version of your firmware file? Run > > strings esfw52.bin | grep -i epson > > to extract it from the file > > > EPSON EPSON Scanner1 > EPSON GT-F520 1.08 > > HTH > Jim > So we use the same backend and firmware with a different result. Should it be due to my installation : I've make and installed the cvs code in /usr/local without uninstalling the debian version which is in /usr I've done this awfully thing because of some dependancy problem, that I haven't managed at this time. But I take care when I wanted to scan a film to call /usr/local/bin/xscanimage Do you think it can be the reason of my problem ? Patrick.
