Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 08:48:30AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > I know that much, but all the sane-backend stuff mentions the "sane" > service only, AFAIK. If Henning went through the trouble of getting > the "sane-port" service registered with IANA (instead of "sane") then > shouldn't the implementation be patched to match?
I went "through the trouble" of getting the service registered to make sure that nobody else uses port 6566. At that time I didn't really care about the name used in "services". I'm not sure why I used "sane-port" but I remember there was some reason not to use "sane". > If Henning meant to register the "sane" service, then something went > wrong in getting that across and IANA registered the wrong service. > > Question stands: what is the prefered way to fix this? Update the documentation in CVS. Mention in the manpages that "sane" is now deprecated. Other opinions? Bye, Henning
