--w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:59:22PM +0100, Bertrik Sikken wrote: > So you're getting more rubbish than actual image data? At the moment, yes. > From the code I see that command 0x1500 always writes 300, > perhaps this needs to be changed to the same DPI value written > with command 0x2505? No! Don't do that. That value is (as far as we know) the units that the SCANREQUEST values (offx/y, lenx/y) are given in. If you fiddle with that it stasrt going off to scan the wrong area of the page. Unless there is evidence it does more I'm not touching it. The windows scanning program sets it once during the initiaisation and never touches it again, no matter how many scans you do. --=20 Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Support bacteria! They're the only culture some people have. --w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+ZpDJY5Twig3Ge+YRAlo/AJwMQRZonnO30WarADbs19wmnPdMoQCeN0Y8 PKGnxnxwxfzg46fyHABMutk= =Vlo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej--
