Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:57:33AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:43:03AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
<snip> >>However, this is a 1200*2400 dpi scanner. Probably 600*2 dpi is >>cheaper than 1200 dpi CCDs. However 600 dpi CCDs are pretty common so >>I'm surprised that there are 300*2 CCDs. > > > It says on the box it has 2400x2400dpi hardware resolution. Stepping the > motor increases your y resolution but I'm not sure how to increase the x. > Examining the data from the scanner reveals it's still sending three scan > lines (one for R,G and B) but each line consists of (for this scan at least): > > 0x5F0 bytes of normal data > 0x50 bytes of zeros > 0x1DC2 bytes of what can only be described as rubbish > > Probably something wrong with the setup. Need to do a scan in windows. Maybe > later this week. So you're getting more rubbish than actual image data? From the code I see that command 0x1500 always writes 300, perhaps this needs to be changed to the same DPI value written with command 0x2505? Regards, Bertrik
