For now, I would like to keep the dc240 backend - mainly because it makes it available to people that don't have the gphoto2 package. However, I think it makes sense to disable it if the compiler is not gcc. Does it make sense to do that for this release? Can anyone suggest a good way to do this in autoconf.
-- Peter Fales On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:21:13PM +0100, Major A wrote: > > > That's interesting because nobody has noticed until now. dc240 is in > > sane-backends since 1.0.5. Maybe all the systems that were used to > > test don't have libjpg so dc240 wasn't even compiled. > > That's probably the case. > > Just a quick thought -- if the dc240 is a driver for a digital camera, > why is it necessary to have a SANE backend for it anyway? If it's > supported by gphoto(2), that should be sufficient. May I suggest we > make compilation optional, with an --enable-dc240 switch? > > Andras > > =========================================================================== > Major Andras > e-mail: and...@users.sourceforge.net > www: http://andras.webhop.org/ > =========================================================================== > _______________________________________________ > Sane-devel mailing list > sane-de...@www.mostang.com > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
