> That's interesting because nobody has noticed until now. dc240 is in
> sane-backends since 1.0.5. Maybe all the systems that were used to
> test don't have libjpg so dc240 wasn't even compiled.
That's probably the case.
Just a quick thought -- if the dc240 is a driver for a digital camera,
why is it necessary to have a SANE backend for it anyway? If it's
supported by gphoto(2), that should be sufficient. May I suggest we
make compilation optional, with an --enable-dc240 switch?
Andras
===========================================================================
Major Andras
e-mail: and...@users.sourceforge.net
www: http://andras.webhop.org/
===========================================================================
