Le jeudi 3 novembre 2022 à 12:59:48 UTC+1, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit :
@Emmanuel, why are you saying that FriCAS returns the same as sage? > I tried solve(Sys0, IVars) and got the same result as the one given by the default solver… For me, fricas.solve works as expected. > Could you give us your execution *especially* how to convert the result back to Sage ? Martin > > On Sunday, 9 October 2022 at 18:43:03 UTC+2 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > >> It turns out that the original author has also posted this problem in >> sage-devel <https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/6jIKV1hPoCQ>, wher >> we should continue… >> >> Le dimanche 9 octobre 2022 à 18:27:54 UTC+2, Nils Bruin a écrit : >> >>> On Sunday, 9 October 2022 at 08:45:36 UTC-7 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: >>> >>>> ... and all is not fresh in Sympy's realm either. >>>> >>>> Full details in [this ask.sagematjh.org question]( >>>> https://ask.sagemath.org/question/64344/solving-a-system-of-linear-equations-with-complex-numbers-yields-false-solution/?answer=64363#post-id-64363 >>>> ). >>>> >>>> ... >>> >>>> Advoce requested on how to file tickets/bug reports efficiently. >>>> >>> For now, it's still through trac, I believe, but in a few weeks it would >>> but a through github issues. With the reproduction in maxima standalone, >>> especially because the erroneously solved system is obtained by >>> specialization from a system that is solved correctly, this can be reported >>> "upstream" to maxima and I'm sure it will get due attention eventually. >>> >>> Their bug reporting hasn't changed, I think: >>> https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/ >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/0b7c11ce-5bab-4d7a-92bf-072d46dfbcb7n%40googlegroups.com.
