On Friday, May 31, 2013 2:39:43 PM UTC+2, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Johannes, > > On 2013-05-31, Johhannes <dajo...@web.de <javascript:>> wrote: > > yea, that helped a lot. I just started to figure out where the > FreeModule > > implementation violates the categories model. > > Do you mean the code in > sage.combinat.free_module.CombinatorialFreeModule? Sure, this complies > with the category and coercion framework. I was talking about the old > code (predating the category framework) in sage.modules. > > I meana ''sage.modules.free_module' where is the difference between them?
> > If I have some ideas how to fix it, I'll post them here. > > Code should not be posted on sage-devel, but on our trac server. See the > developer's guide, > http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk_through.html#submitting-a-change > > > > > Do you have a reference for the group action implementation too? > > Group acting on what? > > that's the first point I'm not sure about. more detailed reference about the register_action and get_action methods. For me, a group can act on a lot of objects, but I don't know for which ones it's implemented in sage. > Best regards, > Simon > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
