On 26 March 2012 17:37, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2012-03-25, Emil <emi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've also been using CSDP from Sage lately. I am calling the >> stand-alone program, rather than using the Python interface (which >> isn't a very good solution). > why? Is it buggy?
Well, you can't stop/pause/save intermediate solutions. Changing options means writing to a parameters file. Precision could be lost in the double->string->double translations (?). >> I was wondering whether using pycsdp is the right way to go though. >> Wouldn't it be best to write a small Cython wrapper for the C library? >> (I was planning at some point to do this myself.) > > well, if pycsdp works, then why you might want another interface? I don't know, i was only asking a question! (I guess I looked at the code and thought that it would be lot simpler in Cython, but as you say it is already written in the way it is...) Emil -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
