First of all, congratulations for this free and wonderfull software.

I have a question about GF(2).This is maybe a bit stupid but I cannot find
the answer anywere.

When I use this code, I don't understand why y^3 is still there because I
think this is equal to y for both 0 and 1. So why the Groebner basis is [y^3
+ y, x^2 + y^2 + 1, x*y] and not [x+y+1,x*y], which should be reduced to
[x+y+1]. I tried to add a modulus but it does'nt seem to work. I am quite
disappointed because all the interest of Groebner basis in cryptanalysis is
that the degree of polynomes don't grow a lot due to the fact that x^2 + x
=0.

sage: Q.<x,y> = PolynomialRing(GF(2))
sage: R2 = GF(2,name='x,y')
sage: R2
Finite Field of size 2
sage: e=[x**2+y**2+1,x*y]
sage: e
[x^2 + y^2 + 1, x*y]
sage: I=ideal(e)
sage: I
Ideal (x^2 + y^2 + 1, x*y) of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over
Finite Field of size 2
sage: B=I.groebner_basis(); B
[y^3 + y, x^2 + y^2 + 1, x*y]

So my question is : why SAGE doesn't take into account the fact that x^2 = x
in GF(2) and how do force him to do it.

Thanks for your help

PS : I tried with integer(2) but there is exactly the same matter

-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to