Hi Burcin, On 25 Okt., 11:04, Burcin Erocal <bur...@erocal.org> wrote: > I suggest we raise a ValueError when there is no operator or operands. > This is already done for iterators of symbolic expressions in #7537: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7537 > > Can you open a ticket to do the same for operands() and operator()? > > > Is it really necessary to break s.operands() into smaller pieces in > > order to reconstruct a sum? Why can' op_add accept an argument list of > > arbitrary length, in particular since the list of operands of a sum > > can be longer than two? > > You are right, for add and mul we should return a function that can > handle multiple arguments. I am not sure if the top level sum() and > prod() functions would be suitable here though. > > Can you open a ticket for this as well?
I only opened one ticket, namely #10169, aiming at making s==s.operator()(*s.operands()) work uniformely. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
