On Jun 2, 9:55 am, Tim Joseph Dumol <t...@timdumol.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > sage: matrix([[1,1,-2,1,1,-2],[-2,1,1,-2,1,1],[1,-2,1,1,-2,1]]) > > [ 1 1 -2 1 1 -2] > > [-2 1 1 -2 1 1] > > [ 1 -2 1 1 -2 1] > > sage: M = _ > > sage: M > > <bound method NullTranslations.ugettext of <gettext.NullTranslations > > instance at 0x10eacf8c0>> > > > I thought that not so long ago _ was a reference to the object in the > > previous thing, but now apparently (I don't know what NullTranslations > > is, but I'm guessing) when _repr_ is called I get _ to be whatever the > > return value of its output is (?). > > > As a result, _ becomes substantially less useful. If I had remembered > > to do > > > sage: M = matrix([[1,1,-2,1,1,-2],[-2,1,1,-2,1,1],[1,-2,1,1,-2,1]]) > > > I would have done so in the first place, but _ is often the easiest > > way to save me from my memory (and yes, I realize the command history > > can help too but _ was the *most* easy way to do it). > > > Any ideas on whether I'm doing something wrong? Or, how to get my old > > behavior back (if it indeed ever existed...)? > > > Thanks, > > - kcrisman > > > -- > > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<sage-support%2bunsubscr...@google > > groups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support > > URL:http://www.sagemath.org > > I believe this issue was fixed in Sage 4.4.2.alpha0 (at least). >
Well... sage: version() 'Sage Version 4.4.2, Release Date: 2010-05-19' -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
