hello,

this must be the slowest reply in the history of sage. More than a
month later, i have upgraded and am now running sage 4.3. When i enter
your lines :

> sage: k.<i> = CyclotomicField(4)
> sage: R.<x> = k[]
> sage: p=3; K.<r> = NumberField(x^2-p)
> sage: i = K(k.gen())
> sage: CDF(i)

... i get a very long error message, starting with

RuntimeError                              Traceback (most recent call
last)

/Users/pedro/.sage/temp/m_guillot.u_strasbg.fr/86998/
_Users_pedro_toto_sage_0.py in <module>()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
complex_double.so in
sage.rings.complex_double.ComplexDoubleField_class.__call__ (sage/
rings/complex_double.c:3532)()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/
parent.so in sage.structure.parent.Parent.__call__ (sage/structure/
parent.c:4956)()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/
coerce_maps.so in
sage.structure.coerce_maps.DefaultConvertMap_unique._call_ (sage/
structure/coerce_maps.c:3142)()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/structure/
coerce_maps.so in
sage.structure.coerce_maps.DefaultConvertMap_unique._call_ (sage/
structure/coerce_maps.c:3040)()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
complex_double.so in
sage.rings.complex_double.ComplexDoubleField_class._element_constructor_
(sage/rings/complex_double.c:3933)()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
number_field/number_field_element.so in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_element.NumberFieldElement._complex_double_
(sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.cpp:8220)()

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
complex_field.pyc in __call__(self, x, im)
    265         if im is not None:
    266             x = x, im
--> 267         return Parent.__call__(self, x)
    268
    269     def _element_constructor_(self, x):

it goes on forever and ends with :

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
polynomial/polynomial_ring.pyc in _element_constructor_(self, x,
check, is_gen, construct, **kwds)
    310                 x = x.Polrev()
    311
--> 312         return C(self, x, check, is_gen, construct=construct,
**kwds)
    313
    314     def is_integral_domain(self, proof = True):

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
polynomial/polynomial_element_generic.pyc in __init__(self, parent, x,
check, is_gen, construct)
    610     """
    611     def __init__(self, parent, x=None, check=True,
is_gen=False, construct=False):
--> 612         Polynomial.__init__(self, parent, is_gen=is_gen)
    613
    614         if construct:

/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/
polynomial/polynomial_element.so in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.__init__ (sage/
rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:3580)()

RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python
object

Does this happen to everyone on sage 4.3 ? the upgrade seems to have
worked fine, but for a couple of warnings, like

/Applications/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/rings/polynomial/
pbori.rst:6: (WARNING/2) error while formatting signature for
sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleSetIterator.next: arg is not a
module, class, method, function, traceback, frame, or code object
/Applications/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/rings/polynomial/
pbori.rst:6: (WARNING/2) error while formatting signature for
sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanMonomialIterator.next: arg is not a
module, class, method, function, traceback, frame, or code object
/Applications/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/rings/polynomial/
pbori.rst:6: (WARNING/2) error while formatting signature for
sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanMonomialMonoid.gen: arg is not a
Python function

(21 warnings in total)

thanks for your help
pierre
-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to