Hi, Martin, On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ryan Hinton wrote: >> What if I want to develop in certain sections (coding theory, maybe >> some graph theory)? > > I wouldn't recommend deleting static libraries because it is too > easy to shoot > yourself in the foot if you do. If you only strip your binaries/ > libraries > then you can still develop, you just won't get very nice backtraces > if Sage > crashes on you.
A couple of questions: What's the problem with deleting static libraries after the build? They aren't used once the compilation is done. Also: I don't think you can strip dynamic libraries safely. Maybe the "non-external" symbols, if your linker/librarian supports it. Did I misunderstand your suggestion? Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income -------- Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want. -------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
