William Stein wrote: > > That said, I vaguely recall Guido van Rosum saying that he was > seriously considering changing this behavior in "Python 3000", > i.e., the version of Python that will seriously break backwards > compatibility. I have no idea what will really happen. >
I did not find this here: http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html The 'old' behaviour seems to be continued: Python 3.0a1 (py3k:57844, Aug 31 2007, 16:54:27) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information. **************************************************************** Personal firewall software may warn about the connection IDLE makes to its subprocess using this computer's internal loopback interface. This connection is not visible on any external interface and no data is sent to or received from the Internet. **************************************************************** IDLE 3.0a1 >>> 1+1 2 >>> for i in range(10): print(i) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>> print(i) 9 >>> Jaap Notice the changed print statement: print is here a function! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
