My way of referencing SAGE might not be the best way but I like this:
\bibitem[S]{S} W. Stein, {\tt SAGE}: Software for Algebra and Geometry
Experimentation,
\newline
\url{http://sage.scipy.org/}
\newline
\url{http://www.sagemath.org/}
I like referencing it that way because S is both the first letter of SAGE and
William Stein's last name, so it seems like a natural place for people to look
if they want to quickly find the reference listed in the bibliography.
Since bibtex doesn't have a software field, I suppose you could reference the
SAGE Reference Manual if you wanted a book. The SIGSAM article is not bad but
it is 2 years old now.
Papers using SAGE are listed at http://www.sagemath.org/pub.html
The more the better!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 6/26/07, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the publication list for SAGE (http://sagemath.org/pub.html), it says
> to cite SAGE as:
>
> SAGE Mathematics Software, Version 2.6, http://www.sagemath.org/
>
> Can we put up an official Bibtex version of this? Is the following
> sufficient?
>
> @misc{sage,
> Title = {{SAGE} Mathematics Software, Version 2.6},
> Note = {\url{http://www.sagemath.org/}}}
>
>
>
> In the past, it seems that the preferred citation was the following
> paper. Is it not the preferred way of citing SAGE anymore?
>
> @article{sage,
> author = {Stein, William and Joyner, David},
> title = {{SAGE}: System for Algebra and Geometry Experimentation},
> journal= {Communications in Computer Algebra (SIGSAM Bulletin)},
> year = {July 2005},
> note = {{\tt http://www.sagemath.org}.}
> }
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
